Why learn about archetypes?

Understanding Human Nature

The School of Athens by Rafael

Archetypes provide a framework for exploring life’s fundamental questions that cuts across religious, philosophical, and ideological divides. While archetypes can’t give us conclusive answers, they can help to make sense of the substantial differences between contradictory perspectives on these topics.

Archetypes are the elements of human nature. Learning about archetypes means learning about ourselves: our desires and aspirations, our fears, our values and moral intuitions, the binding ties of family and friendship, and our place in society and the world.

The Romantic philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau claimed that human nature was virtuous but for the corrupting influence of society. The more conservative philosopher Thomas Hobbes claimed the contrary: society is all that restrains humanity’s natural tendency toward selfishness, aggression, and violence. The Jungian view of human nature is more sophisticated. Archetypes provide a holistic framework that can hold both of these perspectives.

If we consider the child and maiden archetypes, we can see the roots of Rousseau’s perspective. And Hobbes’s assertion aligns with the father archetype.

Archetypal patterns can be found at the heart of many of our most popular and enduring narratives. We are inspired by archetypal heroes and tricksters. Archetypal mother figures remind us of the importance of family and community, while archetypal father characters show us the value of logic and moral clarity. Every archetypal image reflects back at us some part of ourselves. We often recognize archetypal motifs, even if we can’t understand them or articulate what we see.

Archetypes as Tools for Writers

Photo of George Lucas

“I had studied Joe Campbell, … and I really tried to take these psychological motifs from mythology all over the world. As a result, I was able to take ideas that go through all societies, through all the ages, and … put them into a razzle-dazzle, Saturday-matinee serial action-adventure film.”

—George Lucas on the archetypal elements in Star Wars

Ever since the incredible success of Star Wars, countless writers have been studying Jungian archetypes and intentionally weaving them into their stories. But what value does this actually provide?

Archetypal insights can help with:

  • Designing balanced character webs composed of compelling, dynamic figures
  • Conceptualizing conflict and resolution in ways that align with and reveal character
  • Aligning dramatic stakes with characters’ worldviews
  • Guiding character choices and growth

Knowledge of archetypes can help writers create compelling characters, memorable plots, and vibrant story worlds. But most importantly, it gives writers a way to conceptualize how characters relate to other people and how they see themselves and their place in the world. This deep understanding helps writers design characters who are dynamic and surprising without feeling inconsistent.

For writers, archetypes are a general-purpose tool. These slippery, abstract ideas might not be the go-to solution for any particular problem. But an archetypal perspective brings together the dimensions of story into a single, coherent framework. This allows writers to conceptualize how character, relationships, conflict, plot, dramatic stakes, and theme are all connected. And unlike more prescriptive dramatic frameworks, this tool never limits the number or quality of options available when working through a set of questions or challenges.

Balancing character webs

Character archetype relationships diagram. A pie-chart looking diagram has six equal parts: Starting at the top and going clockwise are magician, father, hero, child (at 6:00), then together in one section are the maiden and trickster at 8:00. The mother is the last element before returning to the magician. Beneath the first circle is a second, split in two parts by a smaller concentric circle. The shadow is the outer area and the animum is the inner area.

A story’s character web should contain a diversity of perspectives and values. This allows character choices to reflect the divergent impacts of their distinct views and motivations.

In a character web, an archetypal hero might represent driving passion and an individualistic attitude. That character might be thematically balanced by an archetypal mother with a more socially conscious point of view or an archetypal father who represents a detached, intellectual disposition.

What’s great about this character web framework is that it can even apply to stories that don’t feature clear archetypal figures. For example, an individualistic character and a more family-focused character will balance each other out in a character web like a hero and a mother, even if they don’t really embody those respective archetypes.

Conceptualizing conflict and resolution

Different characters approach obstacles and conflict in different ways. Some attack problems directly with relentless energy, while others look for points of leverage. Some strategize, while others take a trial-and-error approach. Some use formal authority to marshal support from subordinates, and others ask for help from friends and family.

Each character archetype is associated with a basic approach to problem-solving. Tricksters tend to be improvisational and tactical when confronting problems. This means they’re not easily outmaneuvered. Heroes tend to strategize and try to anticipate the outcomes of their actions. So, when a writer puts a hero and trickster in direct competition, archetypes can provide some basic trajectories for the conflict. The hero might win by virtue of a strong but flexible strategy. Or the trickster might prevail by exploiting a tactical advantage that the hero didn’t plan for.

By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of these different approaches and by understanding how they play out against one another, writers can more easily and reliably orchestrate conflict, escalation, and resolution in their stories.

Charting character growth

Each character archetype is rooted in a general orientation to the self, to others, and to the environment. And each orientation comes with its own respective blind spots, which can describe a character’s flaw or ghost. These blind spots provide a writer a starting point for considering the sorts of obstacles a character might encounter. Likewise, the writer can start looking for revelations and opportunities for growth by having the character, in the end, come to see beyond the perspective in that archetypal orientation.

For example, maidens are oriented toward other people and personal relationships. Their character arcs often involve turning inward and learning to follow their own personal passions or to rely on their own judgment and abilities. This is just one set of possibilities. It’s not a prescription. Being familiar with such patterns can point a writer in a productive direction without constraining their options. And writers who understand why these patterns have emerged in the first place might gain a deeper insight into why and how character arcs work.

Useful constraints and infinite possibilities

If you’re a writer, the archetype framework presented on this site is structured enough to help guide your creativity, but it will never box you in. There are no rules or templates. This is just an organized set of observations that you can choose to apply as you see fit. Archetypal patterns can be joined in any configuration you can imagine, each with infinite possible variations.

Scroll to Top